Lahey Support
08-15-2003, 01:33 AM
On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 11:53:07AM +1000, [address removed] wrote:
> This direction confuses me. One minute we're complaining about the death of
> Fortran 95/2000. The next we're proposing it's death and adopting ELF 90.
> I'm sure there are many other styles out there. Many others like me may say
> "Why not my Fortran subset style", ( which is based on the KISS principle).
> Certainly a web based pool of coded solutions would be good. But aren't
> there already commercially (un)available ones out there. The implications
> of free has a lot of appeal and hopefully increased circulation.
I think that the existance of a free compiler
(http://g95.sourceforge.net) would be a great aid as well. I kno plenty
of people using f77 because of g77 (apart from the seamless integration
with gcc).
On the archive stuff, good examples are given by CTAN, CPAN and
all that stuff... They don't seem to follow any sort of standard (perl
coding standards? paaah!!!!!)
Regards
José
--
José L Gómez Dans PhD student
Tel: +44 114 222 5582 Radar & Communications Group
FAX; +44 870 132 2990 Department of Electronic Engineering
University of Sheffield UK
----------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send to [address removed] the following
as the first and only line of the message body:
unsubscribe fortran
----------------------------------------------------------
> This direction confuses me. One minute we're complaining about the death of
> Fortran 95/2000. The next we're proposing it's death and adopting ELF 90.
> I'm sure there are many other styles out there. Many others like me may say
> "Why not my Fortran subset style", ( which is based on the KISS principle).
> Certainly a web based pool of coded solutions would be good. But aren't
> there already commercially (un)available ones out there. The implications
> of free has a lot of appeal and hopefully increased circulation.
I think that the existance of a free compiler
(http://g95.sourceforge.net) would be a great aid as well. I kno plenty
of people using f77 because of g77 (apart from the seamless integration
with gcc).
On the archive stuff, good examples are given by CTAN, CPAN and
all that stuff... They don't seem to follow any sort of standard (perl
coding standards? paaah!!!!!)
Regards
José
--
José L Gómez Dans PhD student
Tel: +44 114 222 5582 Radar & Communications Group
FAX; +44 870 132 2990 Department of Electronic Engineering
University of Sheffield UK
----------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send to [address removed] the following
as the first and only line of the message body:
unsubscribe fortran
----------------------------------------------------------