Lahey Support
08-15-2003, 01:24 AM
In Eudora Pro all attachments are saved in a sub directory named ATTACH
under the main eudora directory.
As for Norton AntiVirus, I had purchased Norton's Systemworks 2000 not too
long ago, so I tried to install it. The CD said use the emergency
diskettes, After the 1st diskette loaded it said "now put in
diskette#3". Then of course, the program couldn't see
diskette#3. What a piece of crap. Norton installs all this windows
software which I always have to take off because it screws up my system
more than it helps. And they haven't updated the DOS utilities
forever. Text search (TS) and NCOMPARE are invaluable.
Enough whining, I'm trying to speed up a program that uses some very large
matrices (at least to me) where the program maybe 80MB in size. I'm
finding the functions MATMUL and EXP are chewing up most of the
time. There is a lot of other work going on, but the two MATMUL and EXP
functions take up half of the total CPU time. The two lines with EXP
account for 1/3 of the CPU time.
I tried changing from double precision to single precision to see if that
had any impact on execution time. Virtually no difference. There is also
no real time difference between my F90 and F95 compiled programs.
Anybody with any ideas? Do you gain any efficiencies from using
pointers? Does anyone have a decent set of efficiency guidelines. I
don't think the User's Guide programming hints have changed from the days
of F77.
Thanks for any help.
At 08:30 PM 2/24/2000 -0500, you wrote:
>Hi everyone:
>
>So I'm paranoid. Some of you reported that your virus checkers screamed
>about a virus when you opened your email today, some of you got no
>warning. I got no warning.
>
>So I filed the message in a special folder, and labelled it
>"INFECTED!!!"
>
>Then I reasoned that if Norton Anti-Virus version 5.0, for which I paid
>good dollars not-so-long-ago didn't pick up a virus, either the virus
>was a new one, Norton Anti-Virus doesn't work, or maybe its not a virus
>after all - just a file with pretensions. In the first two cases, the
>Norton people should want to know. So I shipped off my file to Symantec
>for a definitive analysis.
>
>Folks - we've been had. Our virus is not a virus. That's what Symantec
>says (see below). Does that make you feel confident?
>
>Mike Milgram
>
>PS. Does anyone know how to save an .EXE email attachment without first
>attempting to open it and praying that you will be presented with a
>SAVE/OPEN warning dialogue? I'm not foolhardy enough to try that, but
>as long as the attachment remains a text file - well, its obviously not
>harmful. Symantec told me so.
>
>________________________________________
>Message received from SARC:
>
>This message is an automatically generated reply. This system is
>designed
>to analyze and process virus submissions into the Symantec AntiVirus
>Research Center (SARC) and cannot accept correspondence or inquiries.
>Please contact your Technical Support representative if more detailed
>information about your submission is required. Do not reply to this
>message.
>
>Below is a status update on your virus submission:
>
>Date: Thu Feb 24 13:09:38 PST 2000
>Michael Milgram
>Dear Michael Milgram
>We have analyzed your submission. The following is a report of our
>findings for each file you have submitted:
>
>filename: C:Program FilesNetscapeUsersgmtrcsmailINFECTED!!!
>machine:
>result: This file is clean
>
>filename: C:Program FilesNetscapeUsersgmtrcsmailINFECTED!!!.snm
>machine:
>result: This file is clean
>
>We have determined that no virus exists on the samples provided.
>
>Developer notes:
>C:Program FilesNetscapeUsersgmtrcsmailINFECTED!!! is a text file.
>C:Program FilesNetscapeUsersgmtrcsmailINFECTED!!!.snm does not
>appear to be infected.
>----------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, send to [address removed] the following
>as the first and only line of the message body:
> unsubscribe fortran
>----------------------------------------------------------
Bob Cohen
(703) 534-7618
[address removed]
----------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send to [address removed] the following
as the first and only line of the message body:
unsubscribe fortran
----------------------------------------------------------
under the main eudora directory.
As for Norton AntiVirus, I had purchased Norton's Systemworks 2000 not too
long ago, so I tried to install it. The CD said use the emergency
diskettes, After the 1st diskette loaded it said "now put in
diskette#3". Then of course, the program couldn't see
diskette#3. What a piece of crap. Norton installs all this windows
software which I always have to take off because it screws up my system
more than it helps. And they haven't updated the DOS utilities
forever. Text search (TS) and NCOMPARE are invaluable.
Enough whining, I'm trying to speed up a program that uses some very large
matrices (at least to me) where the program maybe 80MB in size. I'm
finding the functions MATMUL and EXP are chewing up most of the
time. There is a lot of other work going on, but the two MATMUL and EXP
functions take up half of the total CPU time. The two lines with EXP
account for 1/3 of the CPU time.
I tried changing from double precision to single precision to see if that
had any impact on execution time. Virtually no difference. There is also
no real time difference between my F90 and F95 compiled programs.
Anybody with any ideas? Do you gain any efficiencies from using
pointers? Does anyone have a decent set of efficiency guidelines. I
don't think the User's Guide programming hints have changed from the days
of F77.
Thanks for any help.
At 08:30 PM 2/24/2000 -0500, you wrote:
>Hi everyone:
>
>So I'm paranoid. Some of you reported that your virus checkers screamed
>about a virus when you opened your email today, some of you got no
>warning. I got no warning.
>
>So I filed the message in a special folder, and labelled it
>"INFECTED!!!"
>
>Then I reasoned that if Norton Anti-Virus version 5.0, for which I paid
>good dollars not-so-long-ago didn't pick up a virus, either the virus
>was a new one, Norton Anti-Virus doesn't work, or maybe its not a virus
>after all - just a file with pretensions. In the first two cases, the
>Norton people should want to know. So I shipped off my file to Symantec
>for a definitive analysis.
>
>Folks - we've been had. Our virus is not a virus. That's what Symantec
>says (see below). Does that make you feel confident?
>
>Mike Milgram
>
>PS. Does anyone know how to save an .EXE email attachment without first
>attempting to open it and praying that you will be presented with a
>SAVE/OPEN warning dialogue? I'm not foolhardy enough to try that, but
>as long as the attachment remains a text file - well, its obviously not
>harmful. Symantec told me so.
>
>________________________________________
>Message received from SARC:
>
>This message is an automatically generated reply. This system is
>designed
>to analyze and process virus submissions into the Symantec AntiVirus
>Research Center (SARC) and cannot accept correspondence or inquiries.
>Please contact your Technical Support representative if more detailed
>information about your submission is required. Do not reply to this
>message.
>
>Below is a status update on your virus submission:
>
>Date: Thu Feb 24 13:09:38 PST 2000
>Michael Milgram
>Dear Michael Milgram
>We have analyzed your submission. The following is a report of our
>findings for each file you have submitted:
>
>filename: C:Program FilesNetscapeUsersgmtrcsmailINFECTED!!!
>machine:
>result: This file is clean
>
>filename: C:Program FilesNetscapeUsersgmtrcsmailINFECTED!!!.snm
>machine:
>result: This file is clean
>
>We have determined that no virus exists on the samples provided.
>
>Developer notes:
>C:Program FilesNetscapeUsersgmtrcsmailINFECTED!!! is a text file.
>C:Program FilesNetscapeUsersgmtrcsmailINFECTED!!!.snm does not
>appear to be infected.
>----------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, send to [address removed] the following
>as the first and only line of the message body:
> unsubscribe fortran
>----------------------------------------------------------
Bob Cohen
(703) 534-7618
[address removed]
----------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send to [address removed] the following
as the first and only line of the message body:
unsubscribe fortran
----------------------------------------------------------