PDA

View Full Version : Archive

Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
  1. Re: [LF] Fortran article in the NY Times
  2. Re: [LF] Fortran article in the NY Times
  3. Re: [LF] Fortran article in the NY Times
  4. [LF] F95 with DOS functions?
  5. Re: Re: [LF] Fortran article in the NY Times
  6. [LF] A death announced
  7. [LF] Importing a C++ MSVC DLL
  8. Re: [LF] A death announced
  9. Re: [LF] F95 with DOS functions?
  10. Re: [LF] F95 with DOS functions?
  11. Re: [LF] A death announced
  12. Re: [LF] A death announced
  13. Re: [LF] NY Times - BLIND
  14. Re: [LF] F95 with DOS functions?
  15. Re: [LF] NY Times - BLIND
  16. Re: [LF] [LF digest]
  17. Re: [LF] [LF digest]
  18. [LF] array output
  19. Re: [LF] NY Times - BLIND
  20. Re: [LF] NY Times - BLIND
  21. [LF] F++
  22. [LF] Marketing idea
  23. [LF] fortran vs C++
  24. Re: [LF] array output
  25. [LF] Lahey announces Fortran.NET
  26. Fw: [LF] NY Times - BLIND
  27. =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9f._:_Re:_[LF]_array_output?=
  28. Re: [LF] fortran vs C++
  29. [LF] Rebuttal to Treurich et al.
  30. Re: [LF] Fortran vs C++
  31. [LF] Promoting Fortran
  32. Re: [LF] Lahey announces Fortran.NET
  33. Re: [LF] fortran vs C++
  34. RE: [LF] F95 with DOS functions?
  35. Re: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?R=E9f=2E?= : Re: [LF] array output
  36. Re: [LF] array output
  37. [LF] Duplicate definition link errors ( LF95 Fortran )
  38. Re: [LF] fortran vs C++
  39. [LF] digital slide rule
  40. Re: [LF] Lahey announces Fortran.NET
  41. Re: [LF] digital slide rule
  42. Re: [LF] array output
  43. Re: [LF] fortran vs C++
  44. Re: [LF] fortran vs C++
  45. Re: [LF] Lahey announces Fortran.NET
  46. Re: [LF] fortran vs C++
  47. Re: [LF] Lahey announces Fortran.NET
  48. Re: [LF] A death announced
  49. [LF] my view of Fortran
  50. [LF] variable-length columns
  51. Re: [LF] digital slide rule & Fortran.NET
  52. [LF] NY Times - BLIND
  53. Re: [LF] fortran vs C++
  54. Re: [LF] fortran vs C++
  55. Re: [LF] NY Times - BLIND
  56. Re: [LF] NY Times - BLIND
  57. Re: [LF] NY Times - BLIND
  58. [LF] FORTRAN dead?
  59. [LF] Fortran examples
  60. [LF] decimal arithmetic
  61. RE: [LF] Fortran examples
  62. Re: [LF] fortran vs C++
  63. [LF] screen control interface
  64. Re: [LF] screen control interface
  65. [LF] Promoting Fortran
  66. Re: [LF] data access speed
  67. [LF] data access speed in DAF
  68. [LF] Win 2000 and printing
  69. Re: [LF] Promoting Fortran
  70. Re: [LF] Win 2000 and printing
  71. Re: [LF] Win 2000 and printing
  72. Re: [LF] Win 2000 and printing
  73. Re: [LF] Win 2000 and printing
  74. Re: [LF] Win 2000 and printing
  75. Re: [LF] Win 2000 and printing
  76. Re: [LF] Win 2000 and printing
  77. [LF] Duplicate definition link errors ( LF95 Fortran )
  78. Fw: [LF] Duplicate definition link errors ( LF95 Fortran )
  79. [LF] Listing and details of the system calls within a Windows9X enviro nment.
  80. [LF] Want to obtain F 77 to F90 translation tool.
  81. Re: [LF] system calls
  82. Re: [LF] Listing and details of the system calls within a Windows9X enviro nment.
  83. Re: [LF] Want to obtain F 77 to F90 translation tool.
  84. RE: [LF] Listing and details of the system calls within a Windows 9X enviro nment.
  85. Re: [LF] Want to obtain F 77 to F90 translation tool.
  86. RE: [LF] F95 with DOS functions?
  87. RE: [LF] Want to obtain F 77 to F90 translation tool.
  88. RE: [LF] Listing and details of the system calls within a Windows 9X environment.
  89. Re: [LF] Duplicate definition link errors (LF95 Fortran)
  90. Re: [LF] 'EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION' error messages.
  91. [LF] 'EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION' error messages.
  92. [LF] Marketing update
  93. Re: [LF] 'EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION' error messages.
  94. [LF] 77 to 90
  95. [LF] lf90 & lf95
  96. Re: [LF] lf90 & lf95
  97. to Robin,(Re: [LF] lf90 & lf95)
  98. [LF] FW: Want to obtain a keyboard read routine written in LF95
  99. [LF] FW: Want to obtain a keyboard read routine written in LF95
  100. [LF] keyboard routine
  101. =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9f._:_to_Robin,(Re:_[LF]_lf90_&_lf95)?=
  102. Re: to Robin,(Re: [LF] lf90 & lf95)
  103. Re: [LF] lf90 & lf95
  104. =?iso-8859-1?Q?RE=3A_R=E9f=2E_=3A_to_Robin=2C=28Re=3A_=5BLF=5 D?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?_lf90_=26_lf95=29?=
  105. Re: [LF] lf90 & lf95
  106. [LF] linking gnu c, c++ and linux lahey fortran routines
  107. Re: [LF] linking gnu c, c++ and linux lahey fortran routines
  108. [LF] linux c++/c/fortran linking followup
  109. Re: [LF] Array Bounds Error (was lf90 & lf95)
  110. Re: [LF] lf90 & lf95
  111. [LF] complexity level
  112. [LF] Marketing update
  113. Re: [LF] Marketing update
  114. =?iso-8859-1?Q?RE=3A_R=E9f=2E_=3A_to_Robin=2C=28Re=3A_=5BLF=5 D?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?_lf90_=26_lf95=29?=
  115. [LF] Spindrift problem
  116. Re: [LF] Marketing update
  117. Re: [LF] complexity level
  118. Re: [LF] [LF digest]
  119. [LF] GKStoOpenGL
  120. [LF] just a couple of quick questions.
  121. Re: [LF] my view of Fortran
  122. Re: [LF] complexity level
  123. Re: [LF] [LF digest]
  124. Re: [LF] Marketing
  125. Re: [LF] complexity level
  126. Re: [LF] complexity level
  127. [LF] Fortran marketing - some progress?
  128. Re: [LF] is this a unix format??
  129. [LF] is this a unix format??
  130. Re: [LF] 77 to 90
  131. RE: [LF] Using MS Excel (VBA) to excute a Fortran dll
  132. Re: [LF] is this a unix format??
  133. [LF] Using MS Excel (VBA) to excute a Fortran dll
  134. Re: [LF] lf90 & lf95
  135. Re: [LF] lf90 & lf95
  136. Re: [LF] lf90 & lf95
  137. Re: [LF] lf90 & lf95
  138. Re: [LF] EOF padding
  139. Re: [LF] lf90 & lf95
  140. [LF] FORTRAN to basic
  141. Re: [LF] lf90 & lf95
  142. Re: [LF] lf90 & lf95
  143. Re: [LF] eof padding
  144. Re: [LF] eof padding
  145. [LF] Unable to position file error
  146. Re: [LF] Unable to position file error
  147. Re: [LF] Unable to position file error
  148. [LF] VB passing arrays to/from DLL
  149. RE: [LF] VB passing arrays to/from DLL
  150. [LF] dbl and long
  151. Re: [LF] dbl and long
  152. [LF] unsubscribe fortran
  153. [LF] a couple of questions.
  154. [LF] listing variable names
  155. [LF] getc function
  156. Re: [LF] listing variable names
  157. Re: [LF] a couple of questions.
  158. Re: [LF] listing variable names
  159. RE: [LF] Unable to position file error
  160. [LF] static-linking of .LIB files with LF95
  161. [LF] ForCheck code verifier
  162. [LF] Error when reading a file on a network drive
  163. [LF] more on Fortran's "death"
  164. Re: [LF] more on Fortran's "death"
  165. [LF] apology for LF90 & LF95 problem.
  166. Re: [LF] more on Fortran's "death"
  167. [LF] modules
  168. Re: [LF] more on Fortran's "death"
  169. [LF] Compiler bug in Lahey f90 v. 4.50f?
  170. Re: [LF] more on Fortran's "death"
  171. Re: [LF] Compiler bug in Lahey f90 v. 4.50f?
  172. [LF] Functions in MODULEs
  173. Re: [LF] Compiler bug in Lahey f90 v. 4.50f?
  174. RE: [LF] Compiler bug in Lahey f90 v. 4.50f?
  175. RE: [LF] Compiler bug in Lahey f90 v. 4.50f?
  176. [LF] Can anyone spot any errors with the given code?
  177. Re: [LF] Compiler bug in Lahey f90 v. 4.50f?
  178. Re: [LF] Compiler bug in Lahey f90 v. 4.50f?
  179. [LF] Redhat 7.1 support
  180. Re: [LF] Compiler bug?
  181. [LF] Setting Environment Variables
  182. Re: [LF] Setting Environment Variables
  183. Re: [LF] Redhat 7.1 support
  184. Sv: [LF] a couple of questions.
  185. Re: [LF] Redhat 7.1 support
  186. Re: [LF] Redhat 7.1 support
  187. Re: [LF] Redhat 7.1 support
  188. [LF] Fortran 95 Linux Express v5.5
  189. Re: [LF] Setting Environment Variables
  190. Re: [LF] Setting Environment Variables
  191. Re: [LF] Fortran examples
  192. [LF] Can anybody help me fix this bug?
  193. Re: [LF] Can anybody help me fix this bug?
  194. [LF] LF95 Linux v6.00c patch is available
  195. RE: [LF] Can anybody help me fix this bug?
  196. [LF] Acceleration problem
  197. Re: [LF] Can anybody help me fix this bug?
  198. Re: [LF] Can anybody help me fix this bug?
  199. RE: [LF] Acceleration problem
  200. [LF] Acceleration problem
  201. Re: [LF] Acceleration problem
  202. Re: [LF] Acceleration problem
  203. RE: [LF] Can anybody help me fix this bug?
  204. [LF] Help Needed
  205. Re: [LF] Acceleration problem
  206. Re: [LF] Acceleration problem
  207. Re: [LF] Acceleration problem
  208. Re: [LF] Help Needed
  209. Re: [LF] Why use FORTRAN?
  210. [LF] Why use FORTRAN?
  211. [LF] Fortran futures
  212. Re: [LF] Why use FORTRAN?
  213. Re: [LF] Fortran futures
  214. Re: [LF] Why use FORTRAN?
  215. [LF] max size of a direct access file
  216. Re: [LF] Why use FORTRAN?
  217. Re: [LF] Why use FORTRAN?
  218. [LF] Inexpensive compilers
  219. [LF] Math libraries
  220. Re: [LF] Why use FORTRAN?
  221. Re: [LF] max size of a direct access file
  222. [LF] GUI programming
  223. Re: [LF] Why use FORTRAN?
  224. Re: [LF] Why use FORTRAN?
  225. [LF]
  226. [LF] Winteracter
  227. Re: [LF]
  228. Re: [LF] Math libraries
  229. RE: [LF] Winteracter
  230. RE: [LF] Winteracter
  231. [LF] GUI
  232. RE: [LF] Winteracter
  233. Re: [LF] max size of a direct access file
  234. [LF] Winteracter
  235. [LF] Who?
  236. Fw: [LF] Winteracter
  237. Re: [LF] Winteracter
  238. [LF] max direct access file size
  239. Re: [LF] Winteracter
  240. [LF] Winteracter
  241. RE: [LF] max direct access file size
  242. Re: [LF] max size of a direct access file
  243. [LF] Winteracter
  244. Re: [LF] Winteracter
  245. [LF] Review of discussion on the future of Fortran
  246. [LF] Help Needed
  247. Lahey Linux Survey
  248. [LF] File number limit problem
  249. Re: [LF] File number limit problem
  250. [LF] File number limit problem